The House voted 352-72 this week to approve H.R. 9576, legislation that would establish a permanent National Fraud Enforcement Division within the Department of Justice, marking broad bipartisan support for strengthening federal fraud prosecution efforts.
The measure passed with overwhelming backing from House Republicans and significant Democratic support, indicating rare consensus on the need for a dedicated federal fraud-fighting structure. The division already operates administratively within DOJ following its establishment earlier this year, but the new legislation would convert it into a statutory entity created directly by federal law.
What Happened
All voting Republicans backed the bill, producing 212 GOP votes without opposition. Among Democrats, 139 voted yes while 72 opposed and three abstained. One independent also supported the measure, with nine House members overall marked as abstaining or not present.
Republican Rep. Brad Finstad of Minnesota introduced the bill on July 2 alongside Kansas Republican Rep. Derek Schmidt. Additional Republican cosponsors included Reps. Abraham Hamadeh, Harriet Hageman, and Michelle Fischbach.
The legislation would place the National Fraud Enforcement Division permanently inside DOJ under the Attorney General’s direct authority. A new position—Assistant Attorney General for National Fraud Enforcement—would lead the division, appointed by the president and subject to existing federal law governing such appointments. The division would investigate and prosecute fraud targeting taxpayers, government programs, businesses, nonprofits, and private citizens.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche formally announced the division in April as part of a broader federal anti-fraud campaign. The unit currently coordinates with federal agencies and state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement partners across the country. The House-passed bill extends federal political-activity restrictions to division employees, mirroring those applied to DOJ’s Criminal Division.
The Reaction
Finstad highlighted fraud investigations in his home state of Minnesota as evidence supporting the legislation. “I’m proud to see my National Fraud Enforcement Division Act of 2026 pass in the House today,” Finstad said, adding that the bill would establish “a permanent framework to strengthen our federal fraud prosecution efforts.”

Schmidt emphasized the financial toll of fraud on Americans. “Fraud targeting federal programs and taxpayers costs Americans billions,” Schmidt said, calling the measure “a commonsense step” toward strengthening fraud investigation and prosecution capabilities.
House Republican Conference Chairwoman Lisa McClain framed the legislation as necessary to combat long-standing vulnerabilities. “Fraudsters have gotten rich exploiting government programs and weak enforcement for far too long,” McClain said, arguing the government must possess “the tools and the determination” to pursue individuals stealing from taxpayers.
Despite significant Democratic opposition—72 members voted against passage—the legislation drew support from 139 Democratic House members, preventing the final tally from becoming largely party-line. The House considered the measure under a closed rule providing one hour of debate and one motion to recommit, though that procedural vote drew narrower backing than the underlying bill itself.
What This Means
The Government Accountability Office has estimated federal fraud losses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually based on fiscal years 2018 through 2022, representing roughly three to seven percent of average federal obligations. The watchdog agency has repeatedly urged stronger data analytics, improved information sharing across agencies, and government-wide fraud-risk management frameworks.
The legislation itself is comparatively narrow in scope, focusing on DOJ organizational structure, leadership authority, and political-activity restrictions. It does not create new criminal offenses, modify sentencing rules, establish a separate federal fraud court, or appropriate specific funding levels in the statutory language passed by the House. Its primary effect would be converting the existing fraud unit into a permanent DOJ division guaranteed by federal law rather than executive authority alone.
The Senate must still approve the measure before it advances to the president’s desk for signature. The legislation now moves to the upper chamber, where its prospects for approval remain uncertain despite the House’s decisive margin.
